Category: Resource

An important distinctions we make in Ecosystemic Structural Family Therapy (ESFT) is the difference between first-order change and second-order change. Understanding this difference is crucial for therapists committed to creating meaningful, sustainable outcomes for families.

First-Order Change: Behavior Changes in Interactions (Linear, External, and Compliance-Driven)

First-order change focuses on surface-level behavioral shifts. It’s linear, cause-and-effect in nature, and often driven by external factors like rewards, consequences, or direct instructions. The goal is to stop or start a behavior, and the motivation is frequently tied to the fear of punishment or the promise of a short-term incentive.

While first-order change can offer temporary relief, it rarely addresses the deeper relational dynamics that sustain the behavior over time. In many cases, the family’s underlying patterns remain intact because the structure is still the same. The change is often fragile—likely to regress the moment the external motivator is removed.

For example, a child might stop yelling because they’ve been threatened with the loss of screen time. But without addressing the relational patterns driving the behavior—like poor emotion regulation or lack of parental leadership—the change won’t last.

Or the professional may step in and redirect the child. This makes the therapist part of the structure. So of course the behavior changes. When the therapist leaves the unwanted behaviors signaling distress come racing back!

Second-Order Change: Relational Changes in Interactions (Internal and Transformative)

Second-order change, in contrast, happens at the level of structure, meaning, and relationship. It’s not just about doing something different—it’s about thinking, feeling, and relating differently. The structure (hierarchy, boundaries, and family culture) requires a collaborative change and active in deliberating practicing shift in roles, and new patterns/ emotional responses.

Second-order change is:
✅ Internal – driven by insight, motivation, and relational shifts
✅ Dynamic – involving multiple members of the family system
✅ Sustainable – changes are maintained because they’re meaningful and integrated into daily life
✅ Collaborative – both caregivers and children participate in creating and maintaining new patterns

In ESFT, we guide families toward second-order change by focusing on co-regulation, attachment, co parenting, alliance building, and caregiver leadership. We help families see their patterns, understand their emotional processes, and take ownership of creating new interactional cycles that are healing, not harmful.

For instance, instead of a caregiver demanding a child “just calm down,” the family works together on building emotional safety and regulation strategies that change how stress is handled systemically.

Why the Difference Matters

First-order change may help in the short term—but second-order change transforms the family system. It’s the difference between managing symptoms and reshaping the emotional environment that sustains wellness over time. At PCFTTC, our focus is always on helping therapists and families work toward deep, relational, and lasting change—the kind of change that doesn’t rely on external control but grows from within.

Example of First-Order Change (External, Linear, Compliance-Based)

Scenario: A teenager is refusing to complete homework and is spending excessive time on video games.

Therapist Intervention (First-Order):
The therapist coaches the caregiver to implement a behavioral consequence plan:

• The caregiver tells the teen, “If you don’t complete your homework by 7 PM, you lose access to video games for the rest of the night.”
• The teen complies with the homework expectation—but only because of the fear of losing privileges.

What makes this First-Order Change?

• It’s linear: If you don’t do X, Y will happen.
• It’s externally motivated: The change happens due to fear of consequence, not internal motivation.
• It’s compliance-focused and likely temporary: If the caregiver stops enforcing consequences, the old pattern will likely return.

Example of Second-Order Change (Internal, Relational, Sustainable)

Scenario: Same teenager, same homework avoidance.

Therapist Intervention (Second-Order):
The therapist works with the entire family system to explore the relational and emotional dynamics driving the avoidance through the family assessment tools. Therapist discovers:

• The teen feels disconnected and overwhelmed but doesn’t know how to express this.
• The caregiver tends to escalate quickly into frustration and yelling, which increases the teen’s avoidance and emotional shutdown.

The therapist guides the family to deliberately practice in session:

1. Improve caregiver leadership and co-regulation:
   • The caregiver practices giving clear, emotionally regulated instructions and checks in with the teen about emotional needs before setting expectations.
2. Build emotional safety:
   • The teen is helped to voice feelings of anxiety around schoolwork.
3. Develop a new relational pattern and anchor it:
   • Together, the family creates a homework plan that includes built-in support, positive connection time afterward, and space for emotional check-ins.

What makes this Second-Order Change?

• This change is caregiver lead and therapist facilitated.
• The family shifts relational dynamics and emotional responses—not just behaviors.
• Motivation becomes internal and relational, not driven by fear or reward.
• Caregiver leadership is strengthened, and the teen feels emotionally safer and more engaged, making the change sustainable over time.

Key Difference:

• First-Order Change = External compliance: “Do this…or else.”
• Second-Order Change = Internal and relational shift: “We’re changing how we relate, lead, and respond so that change lasts.”

HELPFUL LINKS:

What is ESFT?

Check out our store to access continuing education credits workshops to bolster your systemic thinking, courses.pcfttc.com

See our youtube page for more pro tips on thinking and working systemically,

Join us on Linkedin, Facebook or instagram!

Citations

Barlow, D. (2004). Psychological treatments. American Psychologist, 59(9), 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.9.869

Hall, G. C. N., Berkman E. T., Zane N. W., Leong F. T. L., Hwang W. C., Nezu A. M., Nezu, C. M., Hong J. J., Chu J. P., & Huang, E R. (2021). Reducing mental health disparities by increasing the personal relevance of interventions. American Psychologist, 76(1),91–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000616

La Roche, M. (2013). Cultural psychotherapy: Theory, methods, and practice. Sage.

La Roche, M. (2020). Towards a global and cultural psychology: Theoretical foundations and clinical implications. Cognella.

La Roche, M. J. (2024). Changing multicultural guidelines: Implications for multicultural psychotherapies. Practice Innovations, 9, 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000255

Sánchez, A. L., Jent, J., Aggarwal, N. K., Chavira, D., Coxe, S., Garcia, D., La Roche, M., & Comer, J. S. (2022). Person-centered cultural assessment can improve child mental health service engagement and outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 51(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2021.1981340 

Smith, T., & Trimble, J. (2016). Foundations of multicultural psychology: Research to inform effective practice. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14733-000

Soto, A., Smith, T. B., Griner, D., Domenech Rodriguez, M., & Bernal, G. (2018). Cultural adaptations and therapists’ multicultural competence: Two meta-analytic reviews. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(11), 1907–1923. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22679

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2015). Racial/ethnic differences in mental health service use among adults (HHS Publication No. SMA-15-4906).

Sue, D. (1999). Science, ethnicity, and bias: Where have we gone wrong? American Psychologist,  54(12), 1070–1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.12.1070  

Recently, I watched a short video of a foster mother cat gently caring for a kitten who had clearly endured trauma. The kitten flinched at every movement, tucked itself into corners, and froze at any attempt at touch. But the mother cat didn’t retreat. She moved slowly, calmly—relentlessly. With every lick, every soft purr, every patient pause, she sent the same message: You are safe now. I won’t hurt you. I’m not going anywhere.

As I watched, I realized: this is exactly what it looks like to build attachment with a child who has experienced complex developmental trauma.

In Ecosystemic Structural Family Therapy (ESFT), we talk about the importance of reestablishing safety and connection as the foundation of all therapeutic work. For children who have learned through experience that adults are unpredictable, unavailable, or unsafe, attachment isn’t automatic—it must be earned through consistency, patience, and deep emotional attunement.

The caregiver’s role is to embody safety. Not to demand closeness, but to offer connection without pressure, and to remain emotionally available even in the face of rejection or withdrawal. Just like the foster mother cat, the caregiver must be willing to show up again and again, saying with their actions:
💬 I see you.
💬 Your fear makes sense. I would be afraid too.
💬 I’ll stay until you trust.

Attachment doesn’t come from grand gestures—it comes from the quiet, repeated moments of co-regulation: sharing calm, honoring the child’s emotional state, and staying present without needing immediate results.

In a trauma-informed, strength-based model like ESFT, we understand that healing happens through relationship, not in spite of it. And while the journey is slow, the impact is profound.

That tiny kitten eventually crept toward the mother cat and tucked itself under her warmth. It didn’t happen all at once—but it happened. The same is possible for the children we serve.

Traumatized children don’t need perfect caregivers. They need relentless ones. Ones who stay. Ones who wait. Ones who whisper safety through every calm breath and patient act of love.

Because healing begins where fear once lived—and trust is the bridge we build one steady step at a time.

If you’ve ever heard the iconic spoken-word song “Everybody’s Free (To Wear Sunscreen),” you know it’s packed with practical, poetic, and unexpectedly emotional advice. Originally a column by Mary Schmich and popularized by Baz Luhrmann, the song reads like a love letter to life’s complexity—with one recurring reminder: wear sunscreen.

But if you listen closely, the heart of the song is about more than sun protection—it’s about perspective. It’s about embracing uncertainty, holding paradoxes, and trusting that life is rarely linear. And if there’s any therapeutic model that echoes that spirit, it’s Ecosystemic Structural Family Therapy (ESFT) – making the complex simple by seeing the challenge as relational not behavioral.

“Don’t waste your time on jealousy. Sometimes you’re ahead, sometimes you’re behind. The race is long—and in the end, it’s only with yourself.”

In ESFT, we often help families move away from competitive, comparison-based narratives and toward shared emotional connection. Healing happens when we shift from proving or winning to joining and reframing. Families don’t need perfect answers—they need safe spaces to be seen, to struggle, and to grow.

“Do one thing every day that scares you.”

In the family therapy room, vulnerability is that one thing. Asking a caregiver to hold limits with love, encouraging a teen to share hurt instead of anger, or guiding a therapist-in-training to sit in discomfort—these are ESFT moments. Progress isn’t comfortable; it’s courageous action inside safe structure.

“Be kind to your knees. You’ll miss them when they’re gone.”

We help families appreciate the everyday, not just the crisis. ESFT is a model rooted in social ecology, reminding us that growth doesn’t happen in isolation—it happens in schools, homes, neighborhoods, and quiet moments. The small, unseen strengths families already possess often become their greatest tools for change.

The Therapist’s Sunscreen? Structure.

Just as sunscreen protects us from invisible harm, structure protects families from the chaos of unchecked patterns. The ESFT therapist holds that structure so families can safely explore their agency. We aren’t rescuers—we’re guides walking families toward their own power.

In a way, wear sunscreen is exactly what we ask families to do: protect what matters, risk connection, trust the process—and be gentle with yourselves.

Therapists are often told to stay reflective, take feedback in stride, and manage their energy. But when you’re experiencing emotional burnout, even minor criticism from a client can feel overwhelming.

Burnout isn’t a sign that you’re doing something wrong—it’s often a sign that you’ve been giving without enough replenishment. And when that’s paired with negative client feedback, it can create self-doubt and isolation.

Systemic family therapists are trained to hold complexity, but we often forget that we are also part of the system. We are influenced by the emotional load we carry, and by the stories we witness. If we don’t build structures of care around ourselves, we start to lose the clarity and compassion that make this work meaningful.

Negative feedback doesn’t have to be internalized—it can be contextualized. Ask: Is this about the therapeutic relationship? A reaction to change? A reflection of broader stress in the system?

More importantly, how are you tending to yourself? Supervision, peer support, and even a quiet walk after a tough session are not luxuries—they’re necessities. Therapists can’t pour from an empty cup. We need to refill regularly, and permission ourselves to rest without guilt.

Engaging every member of a family in therapy is no small feat. In many sessions, one or two voices dominate while others fade into the background. Add in tight session times, and it’s tempting to focus on immediate issues rather than broad engagement.

But presence matters more than perfection. The goal isn’t to fix every dynamic in one session—it’s to build small, intentional moments of connection across time. Each session is a stepping stone toward larger transformation.

Start by redefining success. Engagement doesn’t always mean equal talk time. It might mean one small contribution from a typically silent member. It might look like a validating nod or a moment of shared laughter. These moments matter.

Time constraints force us to be strategic:

• Use change enactments to invite all members to speak without pressure.
• Set clear, attainable goals for each session.
• Circle back to quieter members and validate their presence, even if they say little.

Remember, engagement is not a single moment—it’s a relationship built over time. The more consistent and inclusive the therapist’s approach, the more likely family members are to show up not just physically, but emotionally.

Resistance from clients is one of the most common and frustrating challenges therapists face. Whether it’s missed appointments, shutdowns in session, or flat-out refusal to engage, resistance can feel like a personal failure or a sign that therapy isn’t working. But what if resistance is actually a form of communication?

In systemic family therapy, we reframe resistance not as opposition, but as protection. Often, clients resist because they feel vulnerable, uncertain, or unheard. In fact, that resistance may be signaling something crucial: a desire for improved family communication but a fear of the discomfort or change that might come with it.

By approaching resistance with curiosity rather than control, we open a door to deeper engagement. Instead of asking “Why won’t they cooperate?” we ask, “What are they trying to protect? What do they need to feel safe enough to participate?” This shift reframes resistance as a relational signal—not a defect.

Therapists can leverage moments of resistance by validating the client’s concerns and aligning with their underlying needs. Resistance often melts when a client feels truly seen and heard—especially when they’re struggling to find their voice in a complicated family system.

Improved family communication is not a byproduct of therapy—it’s a central goal. When resistance arises, it’s a cue that the path to better communication is available—but not yet accessible. Our role is to guide the family toward it by leaning into discomfort, modeling vulnerability, and keeping the relational frame intact.

When families are navigating behavioral challenges — whether it’s a child acting out, conflict between siblings, or ongoing tension between caregivers — the natural impulse is to turn to the therapist as the “expert” to fix the problem. In that moment, families often believe that they have little to offer, that the solution must come from outside of them, and that their relationships and history have little to do with the issue at hand.

But as systemic family therapists, we know that this approach is incomplete. In fact, it can be harmful. When families start to believe they are powerless in the face of problems, they become passive observers rather than active participants in their own growth. And when therapists reinforce this dynamic — intentionally or not — we rob families of their agency and diminish the power of the relational system.

A strength-based, relational approach turns this on its head.

Rather than focusing solely on what’s broken, we look for what’s working — the small moments of connection, care, resilience, and effort that already exist within the family system. We ask ourselves:

• Where are the strengths hiding in plain sight?
• How can we build on those to address behavioral challenges together?
• What has this family survived, overcome, or adapted to before?

This perspective allows us to solve problems relationally, not just behaviorally. A child’s acting-out behavior isn’t addressed in isolation but understood within the context of relationships, stressors, patterns, and roles in the family. We see behavior as communication, shaped by the family’s environment, expectations, and connection.

When families experience this shift, everything changes. They stop waiting for the expert to deliver answers and begin participating in creating solutions. They regain a sense of capability and confidence, recognizing that their relationships are not only part of the problem — but the foundation of the solution.

At PCFTTC, we believe that every family holds the raw material for their own healing. Our role is to uncover, name, and strengthen those existing resources while guiding families toward healthier, more connected ways of being together.

Strength-based, relational work isn’t about being soft — it’s about being strategic, respectful, and effective. It’s how we create change that lasts.